LawTeacher.net is a niche essay writing service focused entirely on law: essays, assignments, coursework, dissertation chapters, marking etc etc. I only had one law module at undergrad, so I needed a service that could bridge the gap between technical report habits and proper legal argumentation because, yeah it isn’t my strong point. LawTeacher positions what it sells as model answers to learn from, with writers matched to your instructions / course and an in-house quality check before release. They’ve been operating since 2003 and say they’ve helped over 25,000 students.
Pricing and discounts
Pricing is according to the order form which changes based on the level (like 2.1 undergrad, 1st undergrad etc), word count and deadline. Almost all the pages on the website have “prices from £99” for 1,000 words at undergraduate 2:2 with a 7-day delivery; but faster turnarounds and higher standards cost quite a bit more. But the quote tool makes this obvious before you commit, which I appreciate as I’m generally broke. There are sometimes offers, including long-delivery discounts of 5–10%, a refer-a-friend scheme worth up to 15%, and “freebies” like references not counting towards word count, a plagiarism scan, and a quality report. It’s a premium bracket, but I want a good essay so.
Quality of work
What I received read like a proper law model answer, not generic filler: tight structure, clear signposting of issues, authorities used appropriately, and OSCOLA done correctly. Coming from a background where I’m more used to specs, standards and calculations, the way they built from principles to application helped me translate a problem into a legally reasoned answer. They scan everything with their plagiarism tool and AI and include a plagiarism + AI report, which backed up my own checks. The site states that the quality team’s pre-release review catches mismatches to brief and checks laws, cases and acts are up to date.
For this one, I ordered 2:1 undergraduate standard. As I always say on my reviews, I don’t hand work in, I do like to work on it myself and make it my own. It’s not that it’s wrong in any way, I just like it to be in my voice. So my submission this time got 68% which is at the very high end of the 2:1 grade I ordered.
Writer expertise and qualifications
Law Teacher says its writers are vetted and verified, with proof of qualification and even module-level grades recorded so they only take work they’re genuinely strong in. The work I got felt like it came from someone who really does know the law and how to set out a legal assignment. LawTeacher says new writers complete trial briefs and receive ongoing feedback, and performance is monitored to keep standards high. They’re clearly very big on quality.
Delivery and reliability
Delivery was on time, and the site’s stance here is if they’re late, your work is free under their “Always on time” promise. I didn’t have to use it but nice to have.
If you need speed, they also advertise urgent options on service pages. Communication about progress was steady, so I didn’t feel like I was chasing a runaway deadline.
Customer support
Support was friendly, I used live chat mainly. I did call in once and spoke to a lovely girl called Georgie who was super helpful. Messages were all in response to mine, like not canned messages.
Website usability and ordering process
The order form is easy to use, you just pick level, target grade, word count and deadline, attach your brief and sources, and get a live price. They also have a customer area where you log in and the dashboard keeps files and messages tidy and in one place (unlike my jumbled inbox), and there are useful resources linked throughout, including an OSCOLA referencing tool and free case and act summaries so I do feel like they are really trying to help you do well.
Revisions and refund policies
You get seven days of free amendments as standard, and my one tweak (expanding an explanation and adding a supporting authority) came back the same day. The guarantees are decent: plagiarism-free with a report; “Always on time or it’s free”; never resold; confidential and GDPR-compliant; and a level/grade promise with refund routes if the ordered standard isn’t met, plus a £5,000 no-plagiarism promise in the terms. I’ve not had to use any of them.
User reviews and reputation
Independent reviews aggregated via Reviews.io on their site sit around 4.2/5 from roughly 292 reviews, and the sample comments line up with what I experienced: timely delivery, helpful structure, and professional support, with the usual note that it’s not the cheapest. I prefer that they use a verified partner and display the score openly rather than cherry-picking testimonials. So clearly there is the odd time when they do get it wrong but they always respond and you can see that they’re really doing their best to work it out with the customer.
Final verdict
For law work specifically, my experience of LawTeacher.net is excellent. The combination of specialist writers, having the confidence that someone else is going to do that quality check, obviously the UK based bonus, student-friendly resources and strong guarantees takes a lot of stress out of using an essay writing company like this If, like me, you only touched law briefly at undergrad and want a model that shows how to move from principles to application, this is a top-tier option. It isn’t bargain-basement, but the service, protections and learning value justify the spend.
